| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Tacuarembó. Por información adicional contacte bibliotb@tb.inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha : |
06/10/2017 |
|
Actualizado : |
08/08/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
MIRABALLES, C.; BUSCIO, D.; DIAZ, A.; SÁNCHEZ, J.; RIET-CORREA, F.; SARAVIA, A.; CASTRO-JANER, E. |
|
Afiliación : |
MÓNICA MIRABALLES, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; DIEGO BUSCIO; ANDRÉ DIAZ; JAVIER SÁNCHEZ; FRANKLIN RIET-CORREA AMARAL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANDERSON SARAVIA; ELEONOR CASTRO-JANER. |
|
Título : |
Efficiency of a walk-through fly trap for Haematobia irritans control in milking cows in Uruguay. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2017 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Veterinary Parasitology: Regional Studies and Reports, 2017. |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.vprsr.2017.10.002 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 9 April 2017; Revised 3 September 2017; Accepted 2 October 2017; Available online 4 October 2017. |
|
Contenido : |
Haematobia irritans (horn fly) is a bloodsucking insect that affects grazing cattle. Since this fly's introduction into Uruguay in 1992, pest management practices used to control the insect have been exclusively based on the use of insecticides, which has caused synthetic pyrethroid resistance. The use of insecticides is a major constraint to livestock production due to food safety and environmental concerns. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a walk-through fly trap for horn fly control. The field trail was conducted in 18 trail evaluations dates from 2015 to 2016 in Holstein-Frisian lactating cows on two dairy farms in southern Uruguay. The traps were placed at the exit of the milking parlor. Two digital cameras were used to record video at the entrances and exits of the traps. On each of the 18 trail evaluation, between 30 and 158 cows were randomly selected for fly counting according to video records. On Farm 1, a total of 718 cows were assessed. The median number of flies per cow at the entrance of the traps was 22 (ranging from 1 to 199), while the median number at the exit was three flies per cow (ranging from 0 to 22). The median efficiency of the trap was 88%. Farm 2 had 345 observations, and the median fly count at the entrance of the traps was of 22 flies per cow (ranging from 1 to 129) and four flies at the exit (ranging from 0 to 35) with a median efficiency of 82%. It was observed that the effectiveness of the fly traps varied depending on the number of flies at entry, the season of the year and the farm site. In conclusion, fly traps could be used for the control of H. irritans in milking cows without the use of insecticides.
Current control of horn flies in Uruguay has been solely based on insecticide products.?The walk-through trap showed a mean efficiency of 88% in reducing horn fly infestations on dairy cattle.?The efficiency of the walk-through trap increases as the horn fly infestation increases.?Walk-through traps are a good alternative to control horn flies in dairy cattle in Uruguay. MenosHaematobia irritans (horn fly) is a bloodsucking insect that affects grazing cattle. Since this fly's introduction into Uruguay in 1992, pest management practices used to control the insect have been exclusively based on the use of insecticides, which has caused synthetic pyrethroid resistance. The use of insecticides is a major constraint to livestock production due to food safety and environmental concerns. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a walk-through fly trap for horn fly control. The field trail was conducted in 18 trail evaluations dates from 2015 to 2016 in Holstein-Frisian lactating cows on two dairy farms in southern Uruguay. The traps were placed at the exit of the milking parlor. Two digital cameras were used to record video at the entrances and exits of the traps. On each of the 18 trail evaluation, between 30 and 158 cows were randomly selected for fly counting according to video records. On Farm 1, a total of 718 cows were assessed. The median number of flies per cow at the entrance of the traps was 22 (ranging from 1 to 199), while the median number at the exit was three flies per cow (ranging from 0 to 22). The median efficiency of the trap was 88%. Farm 2 had 345 observations, and the median fly count at the entrance of the traps was of 22 flies per cow (ranging from 1 to 129) and four flies at the exit (ranging from 0 to 35) with a median efficiency of 82%. It was observed that the effectiveness of the fly traps varied depending on the number of ... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
DAIRY CATTLE; MILKING COWS; MOSCA DEL CUERNO; PHYSICAL CONTROL; TRAMPAS PARA INSECTOS; WALK-TROUGH FLY TRAP. |
|
Thesagro : |
HAEMATOBIA IRRITANS; URUGUAY. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L72 Plagas de los animales |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03076naa a2200313 a 4500
001 1057638
005 2019-08-08
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.vprsr.2017.10.002$2DOI
100 1 $aMIRABALLES, C.
245 $aEfficiency of a walk-through fly trap for Haematobia irritans control in milking cows in Uruguay.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2017
500 $aArticle history: Received 9 April 2017; Revised 3 September 2017; Accepted 2 October 2017; Available online 4 October 2017.
520 $aHaematobia irritans (horn fly) is a bloodsucking insect that affects grazing cattle. Since this fly's introduction into Uruguay in 1992, pest management practices used to control the insect have been exclusively based on the use of insecticides, which has caused synthetic pyrethroid resistance. The use of insecticides is a major constraint to livestock production due to food safety and environmental concerns. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a walk-through fly trap for horn fly control. The field trail was conducted in 18 trail evaluations dates from 2015 to 2016 in Holstein-Frisian lactating cows on two dairy farms in southern Uruguay. The traps were placed at the exit of the milking parlor. Two digital cameras were used to record video at the entrances and exits of the traps. On each of the 18 trail evaluation, between 30 and 158 cows were randomly selected for fly counting according to video records. On Farm 1, a total of 718 cows were assessed. The median number of flies per cow at the entrance of the traps was 22 (ranging from 1 to 199), while the median number at the exit was three flies per cow (ranging from 0 to 22). The median efficiency of the trap was 88%. Farm 2 had 345 observations, and the median fly count at the entrance of the traps was of 22 flies per cow (ranging from 1 to 129) and four flies at the exit (ranging from 0 to 35) with a median efficiency of 82%. It was observed that the effectiveness of the fly traps varied depending on the number of flies at entry, the season of the year and the farm site. In conclusion, fly traps could be used for the control of H. irritans in milking cows without the use of insecticides. Current control of horn flies in Uruguay has been solely based on insecticide products.?The walk-through trap showed a mean efficiency of 88% in reducing horn fly infestations on dairy cattle.?The efficiency of the walk-through trap increases as the horn fly infestation increases.?Walk-through traps are a good alternative to control horn flies in dairy cattle in Uruguay.
650 $aHAEMATOBIA IRRITANS
650 $aURUGUAY
653 $aDAIRY CATTLE
653 $aMILKING COWS
653 $aMOSCA DEL CUERNO
653 $aPHYSICAL CONTROL
653 $aTRAMPAS PARA INSECTOS
653 $aWALK-TROUGH FLY TRAP
700 1 $aBUSCIO, D.
700 1 $aDIAZ, A.
700 1 $aSÁNCHEZ, J.
700 1 $aRIET-CORREA, F.
700 1 $aSARAVIA, A.
700 1 $aCASTRO-JANER, E.
773 $tVeterinary Parasitology: Regional Studies and Reports, 2017.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha actual : |
07/06/2022 |
|
Actualizado : |
08/06/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
FERREIRA, G.; CANOZZI, M.E.A.; PERIPOLLI, V.; MOURA, G. P.; SÁNCHEZ, J.; MARTINS, C.E. |
|
Afiliación : |
GABRIELLA CARVALHO MATTOS FERREIRA, Curso de Pós-Graduação em Produção e Sanidade Animal (PPGPSA), Instituto Federal Catarinense (IFC), Campus Araquari, Santa Catarina 89245-000, Brazil.; MARÍA EUGENIA ANDRIGHETTO CANOZZI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; VANESSA PERIPOLLI, Curso de Pós-Graduação em Produção e Sanidade Animal (PPGPSA), Instituto Federal Catarinense (IFC), Campus Araquari, Santa Catarina 89245-000, Brazil.; GABRIELY DE PAULA MOURA, Instituto Federal Catarinense (IFC), Campus Araquari, Santa Catarina 89245-000, Brazi.; JAVIER SÁNCHEZ, Department of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown PE C1A 4P3, Canada.; CARLOS EDUARDO NOGUEIRA MARTINS, Curso de Pós-Graduação em Produção e Sanidade Animal (PPGPSA), Instituto Federal Catarinense (IFC), Campus Araquari, Santa Catarina 89245-000, Brazil. |
|
Título : |
Prevalence of bovine Babesia spp., Anaplasma marginale, and their co-infections in Latin America: Systematic review-meta-analysis |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases, 4 July 2022, Volume 13, Issue 4, 101967. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.101967 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.101967 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 10 December 2021, Revised 3 May 2022, Accepted 11 May 2022, Available online 14 May 2022, Version of Record 18 May 2022. Corresponding author: E-mail address: carlos.martins@ifc.edu.br (C.E.N. Martins). |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract:
Bovine parasitic sadness, comprised of the diseases babesiosis and anaplasmosis, has a large impact on cattle farming in several countries, as it compromises animal productivity. Using systematic review (SR)-meta-analysis (MA) methodology, our objective was to summarize and to investigate study characteristics associated with prevalence of Babesia spp. and Anaplasma marginale infection in Latin American cattle herds. Five electronic databases were used. The inclusion criteria were studies that assessed the prevalence of Babesia spp. and A. marginale in cattle in Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, Colombia, and Mexico. The reported prevalences were converted to logistic scale and summarized using random effects MA. The heterogeneity was assessed, separately, for papers from Brazil and from the remaining countries. A total of 28 papers were included in this MA with a high heterogeneity (I2 > 95%). The prevalences of A. marginale, Babesia spp., and their co-infections, in Latin America, were 48.9% (95% CI: 30.3?67.8%), 39.8% (95% CI: 24.6?57.2%), and 26.1% (95% CI: 9.1?55.8%), respectively. The prevalence of A. marginale was higher due to the high prevalence of this agent in Mexico (67.1%). In Brazil, the prevalence was 36.6% for A. marginale, 62.6% for Babesia spp., and 8.2% for their co-infections. The North region of Brazil was reported with the highest prevalence for A. marginale (71.9%), while for Babesia spp., the prevalence was considerably divergent between regions, with the highest values also observed in the North region (97.4%), and the lowest in the South region (9.5%). For studies of Babesia spp. in cattle in Latin America, the heterogeneity was mainly explained by the diagnostic method (98.0%), and country (54.8%). When looking at Brazil alone, a similar pattern was observed, but with lower values (i.e., diagnostic method, 31.5%; region, 25.3%; and climate, 12,4%). The evaluated regions presented different levels of prevalence infections, with most of them being classified as high degree of enzootic instability, which can predispose to the occurrence of outbreaks. MenosAbstract:
Bovine parasitic sadness, comprised of the diseases babesiosis and anaplasmosis, has a large impact on cattle farming in several countries, as it compromises animal productivity. Using systematic review (SR)-meta-analysis (MA) methodology, our objective was to summarize and to investigate study characteristics associated with prevalence of Babesia spp. and Anaplasma marginale infection in Latin American cattle herds. Five electronic databases were used. The inclusion criteria were studies that assessed the prevalence of Babesia spp. and A. marginale in cattle in Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, Colombia, and Mexico. The reported prevalences were converted to logistic scale and summarized using random effects MA. The heterogeneity was assessed, separately, for papers from Brazil and from the remaining countries. A total of 28 papers were included in this MA with a high heterogeneity (I2 > 95%). The prevalences of A. marginale, Babesia spp., and their co-infections, in Latin America, were 48.9% (95% CI: 30.3?67.8%), 39.8% (95% CI: 24.6?57.2%), and 26.1% (95% CI: 9.1?55.8%), respectively. The prevalence of A. marginale was higher due to the high prevalence of this agent in Mexico (67.1%). In Brazil, the prevalence was 36.6% for A. marginale, 62.6% for Babesia spp., and 8.2% for their co-infections. The North region of Brazil was reported with the highest prevalence for A. marginale (71.9%), while for Babesia spp., the prevalence was considerably divergent between... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Bovine parasitic sadness; Cattle; Epidemiology; Risk factor; Tick-fever. |
|
Thesagro : |
ENFERMEDADES DE LOS ANIMALES. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
E16 Enfermedades de los animales |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03258naa a2200277 a 4500
001 1063232
005 2022-06-08
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.101967$2DOI
100 1 $aFERREIRA, G.
245 $aPrevalence of bovine Babesia spp., Anaplasma marginale, and their co-infections in Latin America$bSystematic review-meta-analysis$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aArticle history: Received 10 December 2021, Revised 3 May 2022, Accepted 11 May 2022, Available online 14 May 2022, Version of Record 18 May 2022. Corresponding author: E-mail address: carlos.martins@ifc.edu.br (C.E.N. Martins).
520 $aAbstract: Bovine parasitic sadness, comprised of the diseases babesiosis and anaplasmosis, has a large impact on cattle farming in several countries, as it compromises animal productivity. Using systematic review (SR)-meta-analysis (MA) methodology, our objective was to summarize and to investigate study characteristics associated with prevalence of Babesia spp. and Anaplasma marginale infection in Latin American cattle herds. Five electronic databases were used. The inclusion criteria were studies that assessed the prevalence of Babesia spp. and A. marginale in cattle in Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, Colombia, and Mexico. The reported prevalences were converted to logistic scale and summarized using random effects MA. The heterogeneity was assessed, separately, for papers from Brazil and from the remaining countries. A total of 28 papers were included in this MA with a high heterogeneity (I2 > 95%). The prevalences of A. marginale, Babesia spp., and their co-infections, in Latin America, were 48.9% (95% CI: 30.3?67.8%), 39.8% (95% CI: 24.6?57.2%), and 26.1% (95% CI: 9.1?55.8%), respectively. The prevalence of A. marginale was higher due to the high prevalence of this agent in Mexico (67.1%). In Brazil, the prevalence was 36.6% for A. marginale, 62.6% for Babesia spp., and 8.2% for their co-infections. The North region of Brazil was reported with the highest prevalence for A. marginale (71.9%), while for Babesia spp., the prevalence was considerably divergent between regions, with the highest values also observed in the North region (97.4%), and the lowest in the South region (9.5%). For studies of Babesia spp. in cattle in Latin America, the heterogeneity was mainly explained by the diagnostic method (98.0%), and country (54.8%). When looking at Brazil alone, a similar pattern was observed, but with lower values (i.e., diagnostic method, 31.5%; region, 25.3%; and climate, 12,4%). The evaluated regions presented different levels of prevalence infections, with most of them being classified as high degree of enzootic instability, which can predispose to the occurrence of outbreaks.
650 $aENFERMEDADES DE LOS ANIMALES
653 $aBovine parasitic sadness
653 $aCattle
653 $aEpidemiology
653 $aRisk factor
653 $aTick-fever
700 1 $aCANOZZI, M.E.A.
700 1 $aPERIPOLLI, V.
700 1 $aMOURA, G. P.
700 1 $aSÁNCHEZ, J.
700 1 $aMARTINS, C.E.
773 $tTicks and Tick-borne Diseases, 4 July 2022, Volume 13, Issue 4, 101967. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.101967
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
